That's a mighty big catchup I got goin' there

Work...hell, life is busy these days.

At work, our (only) tape drive failed a couple of weeks ago; Bacula asked for a new tape, I put it in, and suddenly the "Drive Error" LED started blinking and the drive would not eject the tape. No combination of power cycling, paperclips or pleading would help. Fortunately, $UNIVERSITY_VENDOR had an external HP Ultrium 960 tape drive + 24 tapes in a local warehouse. Hurray for expedited shipping from Richmond!

Not only that, the Ultrium 3 drive can still read/write our Ultrium 2 media. By this I mean that a) I'd forgotten that the LTO standard calls for R/W for the last generation, not R/O, and b) the few tests I've been able to do with reading random old backups and reading/writing random new backups seem to go just fine.

Question for the peanut gallery: Has anyone had an Ultrium tape written by one drive that couldn't be read by another? I've read about tapes not being readable by drives other than the one that wrote it, but haven't heard any accounts first-hand for modern stuff.

Another question for the peanut gallery: I ended up finding instructions from HP that showed how to take apart a tape drive and manually eject a stuck tape. I did it for the old Ultrium 2. (No, it wasn't an HP drive, but they're all made in Hungary...so how many companies can be making these things, really?) The question is, do I trust this thing or not? My instinct is "not as far as I can throw it", but the instructions didn't mention anything one way or the other.

In other news, $NEW_ASSIGNMENT is looking to build a machine room in the basement of a building across the way, and I'm (natch) involved in that. Unfortunately, I've never been involved in one before. Fortunately, I got training on this when I went to LISA in 2006, and there's also Limoncelli, Hogan and Chalup to help out. (That link sends the author a few pennies, BTW; if you haven't bought it yet, get your boss to buy it for you.)

As part of the movement of servers from one data centre across town to new, temporary space here (in advance of this new machine room), another chunk of $UNIVERSITY has volunteered to help out with backups by sucking data over the ether with Tivoli. Nice, neighbourly think of them to do!

I met with the two sysadmins today and got a tour of their server room. (Not strictly necessary when arranging for backups, but was I gonna turn down the chance to tour a 1500-node cluster? No, I was not.) And oh, it was nice. Proper cable management...I just about cried. :-) Big racks full of blades, batteries, fibre everywhere, and a big-ass robotic Ultrium 2 tape cabinet. (I was surprised that it was 2, and not U3 or U4, but they pointed out that this had all been bought about four or five years ago…and like I've heard about other government-funded efforts, there's millions for capital and little for maintenance or upgrades.)

They told me about assembling most of it from scratch...partly for the experience, partly because they weren't happy with the way the vendor was doing it ("learning as they went along" was how they described it). I urged them to think about presenting at LISA, and was surprised that they hadn't heard of the conference or considered writing up their efforts.

Similarly, I was arranging for MX service for the new place with the university IT department, and the guy I was speaking to mentioned using Postfix. That surprised me, as I'd been under the impression that they used Sendmail, and I said so. He said that they had, but they switched to Postfix a year ago and were quite happy with it: excellent performance as an MTA (I think he said millions of emails per day, which I think is higher than my entire career total :-) and much better Milter performance than Sendmail. I told him he should make a presentation to the university sysadmin group, and he said he'd never considered it.

Oh, and I've completely passed over the A/C leak in my main job's server room…or the buttload of new servers we're gonna be getting at the new job…or adding the Sieve plugin for Dovecot on a CentOS box...or OpenBSD on a Dell R300 (completely fine; the only thing I've got to figure out is how it'll handle the onboard RAID if a drive fails). I've just been busy busy busy: two work places, still a 90-minute commute by transit, and two kids, one of whom is about to wake up right now.

Not that I'm complaining. Things are going great, and they're only getting better.

Last note: I'm seriously considering moving to Steve Kemp's Chronicle engine. Chris Siebenmann's note about the attraction of file-based systems for techies is quite true, as is his note about it being hard to do well. I haven't done it well, and I don't think I've got the time to make it good. Chronicle looks damn nice, even if it does mean opening up comments via the web again…which might mean actually getting comments every now and then. Anyhow, another project for the pile.